Sahin Boydas
Random theme
Select theme
Back to all articles

By 2030, Your Annual Physical Will Be Conducted by an AI. Here's What That Looks Like.

I've been in the Silicon Valley trenches for over a decade, and I've never seen a shift as massive as AI in healthcare. I'm sharing the hard-won lessons from my own startups and investments-the wins, the failures, and the counterintuitive strategies that actually work.

2024-01-245 min read554 words

I've been in the Silicon Valley trenches for over a decade, and I've never seen a shift as massive as AI in healthcare. I'm sharing the hard-won lessons from my own startups and investments-the wins, the failures, and the counterintuitive strategies that actually work.

What I've Learned From 95 Companies

A few patterns in AI in healthcare come up again and again.

The founders who handle AI in healthcare well understand that you need to move fast and break things.

The Framework That Actually Works

Here is a simple framework for evaluating AI in healthcare. It's not complicated, but it requires discipline.

Step 1: you need to move fast and break things

This is where most people go wrong. They skip this step entirely and jump straight to execution. Don't do that.

Step 2: the market doesn't care about your roadmap

Once you have the foundation right, this becomes much easier. I've watched founders struggle with this for months when the answer was staring them in the face.

Step 3: Iterate relentlessly

Nothing works perfectly the first time. The companies that get AI in healthcare right treat it as an ongoing process, not a one-time project.

The AI Angle

Any discussion of AI in healthcare in 2026 has to include AI. As someone who's invested in Anthropic, OpenAI, Scale AI, and Hugging Face, I have a front-row seat to how AI is transforming this space.

The short version: AI makes good practitioners better and bad practitioners worse. It's an amplifier, not a replacement.

Some teams use AI to get far more out of AI in healthcare. Others spend heavily on AI that solves the wrong problem. The difference comes down to understanding what you're actually trying to achieve.

This connects to broader themes around biotech AI, AI diagnostics, AI radiology that I've been thinking about a lot lately.

The Bottom Line

None of this is rocket science. But it does require intentionality, consistency, and a willingness to learn from mistakes.

If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: start now, start small, and iterate. The founders who win at AI in healthcare aren't the ones with the best strategy on paper. They're the ones who execute, learn, and adapt faster than everyone else.

Companies that take AI in healthcare seriously tend to pull ahead of the ones that don't.

If you're working on something interesting in this space, I'd love to hear about it. Drop me a line.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Q:What experience informs this perspective?

This perspective comes from over a decade of building companies in Silicon Valley, two successful exits (RemoteTeam to Gusto, MovieLaLa to Gfycat), and investing in 234 startups including Anthropic, OpenAI, and Scale AI. I write about what I've lived.

Q:What's the most common pushback you get on this?

People often push back by citing exceptions or edge cases. And they're usually right that exceptions exist. But building a strategy around exceptions rather than patterns is a losing game for most founders.

Q:Do all experts agree with this view?

No, and that's fine. The best ideas in business are often contrarian. I share my perspective based on my experience and data, but I encourage you to seek out opposing viewpoints and form your own conclusions.

Written by

Sahin Boydas

Serial entrepreneur, #1 angel investor, author of Becoming Top 1%

Get Sahin's Weekly Insights

Join 10,000+ founders and investors. One email per week with actionable advice on startups, investing, and building in the AI era.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.