Stop listening to generic advice about investor relations. Here is the raw, unfiltered truth from someone who's been in the trenches.
What I've Learned From 73 Companies
A few patterns in investor relations come up again and again.
The founders who handle investor relations well understand that you should focus on one thing and do it exceptionally well.
Why Most Approaches Fail
Many common approaches to investor relations are flawed at the root.
The root cause is usually one of three things:
Copying what big companies do without understanding why they do it. What works for Google doesn't work for a 10-person startup.
Over-engineering the solution when a simple approach would work better. I've seen teams spend six months building something that could have been done in two weeks.
Ignoring the human element. Technology is the easy part. Getting people to actually use it is where the real challenge lives.
The Framework That Actually Works
Here is a simple framework for evaluating investor relations. It's not complicated, but it requires discipline.
Step 1: the data tells a different story than your gut
This is where most people go wrong. They skip this step entirely and jump straight to execution. Don't do that.
Step 2: customer feedback is the only metric that matters
Once you have the foundation right, this becomes much easier. I've watched founders struggle with this for months when the answer was staring them in the face.
Step 3: Iterate relentlessly
Nothing works perfectly the first time. The companies that get investor relations right treat it as an ongoing process, not a one-time project.
Real Talk: What Actually Matters
Here is what actually matters in investor relations.
First, execution speed beats perfection. Every time. Companies rarely fail because they moved too fast on investor relations. Many fail because they moved too slowly.
Second, measure everything. If you can't measure it, you can't improve it. Set up tracking from day one, even if it's basic.
Third, talk to your users. It sounds obvious, but many founders make decisions about investor relations in a vacuum. Get out of the building. Talk to real people.
This connects to broader themes around revenue-based financing, convertible notes, SAFE agreements, investor relations, pitch deck design that I've been thinking about a lot lately.
The Bottom Line
None of this is rocket science. But it does require intentionality, consistency, and a willingness to learn from mistakes.
If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: start now, start small, and iterate. The founders who win at investor relations aren't the ones with the best strategy on paper. They're the ones who execute, learn, and adapt faster than everyone else.
Companies that take investor relations seriously tend to pull ahead of the ones that don't.
If you're working on something interesting in this space, I'd love to hear about it. Drop me a line.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q:What experience informs this perspective?
This perspective comes from over a decade of building companies in Silicon Valley, two successful exits (RemoteTeam to Gusto, MovieLaLa to Gfycat), and investing in 234 startups including Anthropic, OpenAI, and Scale AI. I write about what I've lived.
Q:How can I apply this thinking to my own situation?
Start by identifying the core principle behind the opinion, not the specific example. Then ask yourself: does this principle apply to my context? If yes, test it in a small, low-risk way before going all in.
Q:What's the most common pushback you get on this?
People often push back by citing exceptions or edge cases. And they're usually right that exceptions exist. But building a strategy around exceptions rather than patterns is a losing game for most founders.
Q:How has this view evolved over time?
My thinking on most topics has changed significantly over the years. Early in my career, I held many conventional views that experience proved wrong. I try to update my beliefs when the evidence changes.